How we Win! Summary of findings on successful climate justice campaigns in North America: Difference between revisions

From Le Hub/The Climate Justice Organizing HUB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "<p class="mwt-paragraph" title="" style="cursor: default;"><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-6" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span role="button" tabindex="0" class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 134.4px; left: -34.4px;"><div class="speechify-ipvczq"><svg width="18.4px" height="18.4px" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="speechify-1dlkuog" style="cursor: pointer;"><rect width="20" height="20" rx="10...")
 
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
<p class="mwt-paragraph" title="" style="cursor: default;"><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-6" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span role="button" tabindex="0" class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 134.4px; left: -34.4px;"><div class="speechify-ipvczq"><svg width="18.4px" height="18.4px" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="speechify-1dlkuog" style="cursor: pointer;"><rect width="20" height="20" rx="10" fill="#2137FC"></rect><path d="M7.217 14.374c.21 0 .389-.084.6-.205l6.13-3.544c.436-.257.589-.426.589-.704 0-.279-.153-.447-.59-.7l-6.13-3.549c-.21-.12-.389-.2-.6-.2-.388 0-.63.295-.63.753v7.392c0 .457.242.757.63.757z" fill="#fff"></path></svg><span class="speechify-1pieqac"><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-2" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"></span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-2">(This page is</span></span></div></span></span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-6" style="opacity: 0;">(This page is</span> a work in progress! Stay tuned for more information :)</p><p class="mwt-paragraph"><br data-mce-bogus="1"></p><p class="p1" title="" style="cursor: default;"><em><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-3" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span role="button" tabindex="0" class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 135.4px; left: -34.4px;"><div class="speechify-ipvczq"><svg width="18.4px" height="18.4px" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="speechify-1dlkuog" style="cursor: pointer;"><rect width="20" height="20" rx="10" fill="#2137FC"></rect><path d="M7.217 14.374c.21 0 .389-.084.6-.205l6.13-3.544c.436-.257.589-.426.589-.704 0-.279-.153-.447-.59-.7l-6.13-3.549c-.21-.12-.389-.2-.6-.2-.388 0-.63.295-.63.753v7.392c0 .457.242.757.63.757z" fill="#fff"></path></svg><span class="speechify-1pieqac">How We Win</span></div></span></span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-3" style="opacity: 0;">How We Win</span> </em>was a 2023 research project supervised by Dr. Jen Gobby, and conducted by McGill students Cassandra Ciafro, Anna Henry, Frida Sofia Morales Mora, Thomas Nakasako, Dafne Ozcan,<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp; </span>Nico Serreqi and Lea Vadez Reyes. It investigates the factors and conditions that led to successes for intersectional climate justice campaigns across Turtle Island (North America), plus the challenges they faced and how they were overcome. <strong>This page includes a summary of some key findings in the report, and key quotes from interviews and surveys with successful campaigners. </strong></p><p class="p2"><br></p><p class="p1" title="" style="cursor: default;"><span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-4" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span role="button" tabindex="0" class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 270.4px; left: -34.4px;"><div class="speechify-ipvczq"><svg width="18.4px" height="18.4px" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="speechify-1dlkuog" style="cursor: pointer;"><rect width="20" height="20" rx="10" fill="#2137FC"></rect><path d="M7.217 14.374c.21 0 .389-.084.6-.205l6.13-3.544c.436-.257.589-.426.589-.704 0-.279-.153-.447-.59-.7l-6.13-3.549c-.21-.12-.389-.2-.6-.2-.388 0-.63.295-.63.753v7.392c0 .457.242.757.63.757z" fill="#fff"></path></svg><span class="speechify-1pieqac">Fourteen successful intersection al</span></div></span></span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-4" style="opacity: 0;">Fourteen successful intersectional</span> climate justice campaigns from Mexico (1), the so-called United States (___), and so-called Canada (___) were explored. ‘Success’ was defined as <em>having achieved material gains, or advancements in physical, financial, legal, or electoral conditions. </em></p><p class="mwt-paragraph p1"><br data-mce-bogus="1"></p><p class="mwt-paragraph p1" title="" style="cursor: default;">Multiple key themes emerged across several campaigns. <strong>Direct action</strong> is the strategy most commonly used to successfully overcome government opposition and police repression. <strong>Legal action and political pressure</strong> were most effective for procedural delays, reducing the economic viability of projects, and sometimes, for facilitating the recognition of Indigenous rights and sovereignty.</p><p class="p2"><br></p><p class="p1" title="" style="cursor: default;"><span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span><strong><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-6" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span role="button" tabindex="0" class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 174.4px; left: -34.4px;"><div class="speechify-ipvczq"><svg width="18.4px" height="18.4px" viewBox="0 0 20 20" fill="none" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2000/svg" class="speechify-1dlkuog" style="cursor: pointer;"><rect width="20" height="20" rx="10" fill="#2137FC"></rect><path d="M7.217 14.374c.21 0 .389-.084.6-.205l6.13-3.544c.436-.257.589-.426.589-.704 0-.279-.153-.447-.59-.7l-6.13-3.549c-.21-.12-.389-.2-.6-.2-.388 0-.63.295-.63.753v7.392c0 .457.242.757.63.757z" fill="#fff"></path></svg><span class="speechify-1pieqac">Coalition building</span></div></span></span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-6" style="opacity: 0;">Coalition building</span></strong> was recognized as both a strategy and a success, leading to new campaigns and/or activist groups, and providing more perspectives and knowledge. <strong>Community engagement</strong> was also recognized as a strategy and a success, fostering collaboration and strong community support. The researchers concluded it was essential, not only for effecting change but also for maintaining strong, diverse and intersectional campaigns that engage a wide variety of activists.</p><p class="p2"><br></p><p class="p1"><span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-7" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"></span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-7">The research concluded</span> that a diversity of tactics is essential for intersectional climate justice campaigns to be successful. A diversity of actors, strategies, and tactics can contribute to the effectiveness of a campaign. They also indicated that government opposition and police repression against Indigenous sovereignty and rights campaigns were large challenges faced by movements. <strong>Thus, community engagement and building strong, large, and diverse coalitions seem to be the most effective strategies, along with engaging in direct action.</strong></p>
<span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-6" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 134.4px; left: -34.4px;" tabindex="0" role="button"></span></span>
 
This page is a work in progress! Stay tuned for more information :)<p class="p1" style="cursor: default;" title="">''<span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-3" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 135.4px; left: -34.4px;" tabindex="0" role="button"></span></span>''</p><div class="speechify-ipvczq"></div><div class="speechify-ipvczq">''How we win'' was a 2023 research project supervised by Dr. Jen Gobby, and conducted by McGill students Cassandra Ciafro, Anna Henry, Frida Sofia Morales Mora, Thomas Nakasako, Dafne Ozcan,<span class="Apple-converted-space">&nbsp; </span>Nico Serreqi and Lea Vadez Reyes. It investigates the following question: ''W<span style="font-size: 14.4px;" >hat can be learned from the struggles and successes of intersectional climate campaigns across Turtle Island (North America) over the past 20 years, and what factors contribute to the success of these campaigns? </span>'''''This page includes a summary of some key findings in the report, plus key quotes from interviews and surveys with successful campaigners for more specific suggestions and knowledge.'''</div><p class="p2"><br></p>
 
To read the full report, see the following: [https://docs.google.com/document/d/18U4F6Hf3ht4CSw6zYw6HXjJsE8QMX640TW6eMD0ZSeo/edit?usp=sharing How We Win! A Qualitative Review of Successful Climate Justice Campaigns in North America in the Last 20 Years]
 
<p class="p1" style="cursor: default;" title=""><span class="Apple-tab-span"> </span><span id="speechify-first-word-listening-nudge-root-4" style="position: absolute; z-index: 10000;"><span class="speechify-1yd8ftj" style="width: 270.4px; left: -34.4px;" tabindex="0" role="button"></span></span></p><div class="speechify-ipvczq">‘Success’ was defined as ''having achieved material gains, or advancements in physical, financial, legal, or electoral conditions. ''<span class="speechify-1pieqac">14 successful intersectional </span>climate justice campaigns from Mexico (1), the so-called United States (___), and so-called Canada (___) were explored to respond to the research question.</div>
 
 
 
The researchers explain 4 key themes that emerged across several campaigns:
*'''Direct action: '''most commonly used to successfully overcome government opposition and police repression.
*'''Legal action and political pressure: '''most effective for procedural delays, reducing the economic viability of projects, and sometimes, for facilitating the recognition of Indigenous rights and sovereignty.
*'''Coalition building : '''both a strategy and a success, leading to new campaigns and/or activist groups, and providing more perspectives and knowledge.
*<strong style="font-size: 14.4px;">Community engagement: </strong><span style="font-size: 14.4px;">both a strategy and a success, fostering collaboration, strong community support and diverse campaigns that engage a wide variety of people.</span>
<span style="font-size: 14.4px;"></span>
 
<span style="font-size: 14.4px;">The researchers concluded that:</span><p class="p2"><span style="font-size: 14.4px;">A diversity of actors, strategies, and tactics contribute to the effectiveness of a successful intersectional campaign. '''Direct action, c'''</span>'''<span style="font-size: 14.4px;" >ommunity engagement </span><span style="font-size: 14.4px;" >and building strong, </span>'''<strong style="font-size: 14.4px;">large, and diverse coalitions seem to be the most effective strategies.</strong><br></p>

Revision as of 20:23, 17 January 2024

This page is a work in progress! Stay tuned for more information :)

How we win was a 2023 research project supervised by Dr. Jen Gobby, and conducted by McGill students Cassandra Ciafro, Anna Henry, Frida Sofia Morales Mora, Thomas Nakasako, Dafne Ozcan,  Nico Serreqi and Lea Vadez Reyes. It investigates the following question: What can be learned from the struggles and successes of intersectional climate campaigns across Turtle Island (North America) over the past 20 years, and what factors contribute to the success of these campaigns? This page includes a summary of some key findings in the report, plus key quotes from interviews and surveys with successful campaigners for more specific suggestions and knowledge.


To read the full report, see the following: How We Win! A Qualitative Review of Successful Climate Justice Campaigns in North America in the Last 20 Years

‘Success’ was defined as having achieved material gains, or advancements in physical, financial, legal, or electoral conditions. 14 successful intersectional climate justice campaigns from Mexico (1), the so-called United States (___), and so-called Canada (___) were explored to respond to the research question.


The researchers explain 4 key themes that emerged across several campaigns:

  • Direct action: most commonly used to successfully overcome government opposition and police repression.
  • Legal action and political pressure: most effective for procedural delays, reducing the economic viability of projects, and sometimes, for facilitating the recognition of Indigenous rights and sovereignty.
  • Coalition building : both a strategy and a success, leading to new campaigns and/or activist groups, and providing more perspectives and knowledge.
  • Community engagement: both a strategy and a success, fostering collaboration, strong community support and diverse campaigns that engage a wide variety of people.

The researchers concluded that:

A diversity of actors, strategies, and tactics contribute to the effectiveness of a successful intersectional campaign. Direct action, community engagement and building strong, large, and diverse coalitions seem to be the most effective strategies.