Global South: Difference between revisions

From Le Hub/The Climate Justice Organizing HUB
Jump to navigation Jump to search
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
'''Global South''' ''"functions as more than a metaphor for underdevelopment. It references an entire history of colonialism, neo-imperialism, and differential economic and social change through which large inequalities in living standard, life expectancy, and access to resources are maintained."'' -Dados and Connell (2012) <ref>Dados, Nour and Raewyn Connell. 2012. “The Global South.”<span>&nbsp;</span><em>Context</em><span>&nbsp;</span>11(1): 12-13.</ref> .
'''Global South''' ''"functions as more than a metaphor for underdevelopment. It references an entire history of colonialism, neo-imperialism, and differential economic and social change through which large inequalities in living standard, life expectancy, and access to resources are maintained."'' -Dados and Connell (2012) <ref>Dados, Nour and Raewyn Connell. 2012. “The Global South.”<span>&nbsp;</span><em>Context</em><span>&nbsp;</span>11(1): 12-13.</ref> .


==Understanding Global South Justice as Climate Justice==
==Understanding Why Global South Justice is Climate Justice==
{| class="wikitable" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 92px; background-color: #ffffff;"
{| class="wikitable" style="border-collapse: collapse; width: 100%; height: 92px; background-color: #ffffff;"
|- style="height: 23px;"
|- style="height: 23px;"

Revision as of 16:21, 29 August 2023

Global South "functions as more than a metaphor for underdevelopment. It references an entire history of colonialism, neo-imperialism, and differential economic and social change through which large inequalities in living standard, life expectancy, and access to resources are maintained." -Dados and Connell (2012) [1] .

Understanding Why Global South Justice is Climate Justice

Disposability discourse

Much discussion around the severity of COVID was lessened by expressing how it mainly sickens and kills elderly, chronically ill, and disabled people. This discourse suggests these groups are seen disposable. 

Loosened restrictions too early

When governments loosened COVID restrictions in response to business demands, political pressure, and public impatience, rather than scientific evidence, high risk populations (the chronically ill, disabled and elderly) were subsequently told they are disposable yet again. 

Working through illness

Regulations around how many sick days should be required when someone falls ill with COVID also demonstrated ableism. In relation to these regulations, and in favour of profit above health, many politicians including US President Joe Biden, praised themselves for working through COVID, instead of encouraging people to rest and recover if they'd fallen ill. 

Individualism

Individuals have been encouraged to make 'personal' choices on vaccines (without legitimate health restrictions), masks and gatherings.

"There is no individual safety without collective safety and collective safety requires that no one is safe unless everyone is safe." - Mia Mingus [2]




If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca.


This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.


Back to Homepage

  1. Dados, Nour and Raewyn Connell. 2012. “The Global South.” Context 11(1): 12-13.
  2. https://leavingevidence.wordpress.com/2022/01/16/you-are-not-entitled-to-our-deaths-covid-abled-supremacy-interdependence/