Modified consensus decision making 101
The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model that centres active listening and teamwork. It can been applied in the context of large and complex issues and decisions to be resolved or decided on.
Where does this model come from?
The creation of this model was inspired by positive decision-making experiences within Extinction Rebellion as well as the struggles of Fairy Creek, the Local Services Committee of Southwestern Quebec, the formal consensus model developed by CT Lawrence Butler and Amy Rothstein and the community of student associations in Quebec, and Pt'chang.
When to use this model?
If you are more than 15 people or a small group made up of people who do not know each other or very little. For large groups, it is possible to apply this model with delegates rather than with each person in each group.
What to prepare in advance?
Before a meeting during which you would like to use this model, determine 2 people responsible for coordination. Their main task will be to find a facilitator (person not participating in the discussions, responsible for stating common intentions), prepare an agenda and share it with the large group for additions.
How to do modified consensus decision making
Presentation of a prepared agenda
The agenda should include:
- the roles to be fulfilled for the meeting (facilitation, responsible for time, responsible for speaking turns, taking notes, taking notes of tasks)
- the time given to each point
- a point used to organize the next meeting / establish its date
Here is a basic sample agenda.
Roles during the meeting | |
Facilitation |
A person who does not participate in the debates leading to decision-making in order to present common intentions for which the consensus will be tested. Must be someone who is trusted by those present to be an active listener who can be unbiased (sometimes an outside person is best suited to fill this role). Drafts and presents the common intentions following discussions following a question for which a decision is necessary. Will forward the agenda to the group. Can intervene without the need for speaking turns.
|
Time manager or time checker |
Respects the duration of each discussion point (if a duration is planned for each point), the duration of the speaking turns as well as the plenary sessions. Before starting a plenary (broad discussion), it is recommended to establish a duration. This can be changed along the way. |
Responsible for speaking turns |
Note the speaking turns of those present and invite people to express themselves. |
Responsible for taking notes |
Note the outline of what is said and what is adopted by consensus. |
| Responsible for task note taking | Write down the tasks that need to be taken on so that the proposals can be carried out. Tasks can be taken after the proposal or at the end of the meeting. |
| Accessibility person | Keep the space accessible for people. See the Strategies that don't sideline people section of the page How to integrate sentiment and security guarding without falling into surveillance? |
Forming a proposal
The team will discuss, the facilitator will formulate a proposal.
We are no longer 'for' or 'against' something. We are looking for a solution TOGETHER. It's not a debate, a discussion or a round table: we speak only in order to help build the solution. Approval manifests itself in silence. Disagreement is manifested by the presentation of new ideas.
[2]