How to occupy spaces to advance your cause
This page was created using insight following a learning circle held by the HUB on the subject, during which members of activist groups shared their learnings relating to this means of pressuring institutions.
Groups Present
Some groups wished to remain anonymous.
The Ecotheque is a university student collective whose goal is to create cooperative, participatory, environmental, inclusive and horizontal projects by following the three pillars of the group: education, art and militant action. In other words, the idea is to create a common knowledge accessible to students who do not necessarily have the opportunity to encounter this type of content due to the unidirectionality of their programs, among other things. |
 |
|
 The Fairy Creek Blockade is a nonviolent direct action from the frontlines of what's colonially called British Columbia. The people who participate fight to protect the remaining 2.7% of ancestral forest in British Columbia from logging. Beginning in August 2020, thirty individual forest defenders from across the South Island, including neighbouring communities, came together to set up a roadblock one thousand meters above sea level on the western ridge of Fairy Creek, in Pacheedaht territory. Since then, a community of Indigenous youth, elders and gender-diverse people have led the full-time outreach work. The blockade received support from future Hereditary Chief Victor Peter of the Pacheedaht and the Union of British Columbia Chiefs (UBCIC). Blockades have united under the #laststandforforforests at four main locations and several pop-up locations. |
Why Occupy?
To escalate pressure
- The occupation can be combined with other tactics: a student strike, hunger strike etc.
- In some cases, occupation may be the first tactic chosen (e.g. in Fairy Creek, occupation was the first tactic advocated)
To democratize its environment
Often, the idea behind an occupation is not only to put forward demands on a specific issue (eg, a university's divestment from fossil fuels), but also to redefine where power should lie; should it belong to the administration of the school or rather to the student body which decides to occupy a building and establish a direct democracy?
How Do You Hold an Occupation?
Choice of Location
- When selecting a location, find out what the implications of occupying it may be.
For example:
School: security is present from the beginning of the occupation.
Forest: police presence is not necessarily assured from the beginning of the occupation. Police will ensure an increased and regular presence if an injunction is filed against the occupiers. In the event that an injunction is filed, the police will make arrests and will not hesitate to use violence.
Direct Democracy and Functioning
Assemblies
More often than not, an occupation will be punctuated by popular assemblies so that the group makes collective decisions concerning:
- their demands
- negotiations with the adversary
- the roles of different committees
- the food
- the activities that will take place during the occupation
- its duration, etc.
Each group chooses which decisions will have to be taken in assembly and which decisions will be taken organically and autonomously (or by committee). Sometimes, it is decided that the decisions taken in assemblies cannot derogate from the constitution of the group.
A meeting usually includes: an agenda, an animation, a secretariat and procedures allowing the harmony of exchanges and decision-making. These can be explained to participants at the start of the meeting. In order to be legitimate, a meeting sometimes includes a quorum, that is to say a minimum number of people present so that the meeting can begin.
Committees
The occupying group may choose to form working committees . Here are some examples of committees and their roles .
| Care Committee | Responsible for thinking about practices that promote the well-being of the group. See below for further resources and reflections on care in the context of occupation |
| Food Committee | Responsible for ensuring food supply. This committee can collaborate with dumpster-diving groups for supplies, find volunteers to cook meals, etc. |
| Equipment Committee | Responsible for finding equipment (tables, tents, fabric and ropes for banners...) and taking inventory of them |
| Safety Committee |
Security committee, responsible for finding processes to ensure the security of participants (conservation of anonymity, encrypted communication, etc.)
|
Committees do not necessarily need to have a coordinating person.
Many groups choose instead to have 1-2 people per committee who ensure that tasks are completed on time (bottom-liners)
For the operation at the care level , you will find more details below.
Adapt the occupation to reality to circumstances
Activity Calendar
An occupation is also an opportunity to organize conferences, workshops, screenings and training. The content and time of these activities can be decided in assembly, but the group can also choose to organize the calendar in an autonomous and participatory way, so that anyone who wants to organizes an activity there during the time slot. which suits him.
Study space
Task board
Enables greater transparency and inclusion of new people
Seek Support from Allied Groups
To maximize solidarity with the occupation, contact allied groups (or develop trusting relationships with future allied groups).
- teachers' union
- Support Employees Union
- Student associations
Care of People in the Occupation
Provide resources in the face of repression
- For people who had to leave the occupation: circle of support available online
- For people who are on the site of the occupation: rest area (where massages are offered, for example)
- Always keep in mind to communicate with our circle of comrades present at the occupation to check if everyone is well.
For example, you could write down the legal information that will be useful to you for the occupation and make it accessible.
Provide a VACS process - Sexual violence
- “Sexually Based Violence (SGBV) is any form of violence committed through sexual practices or by targeting sexuality. Unwanted gestures, words, behaviors or attitudes with a sexual connotation, expressed directly or indirectly, including by a technological means, are VACS. - National Institute for Scientific Research
- It is crucial to think about a policy on sexual violence, even before the occupation begins. If your group does not currently have a clear policy, here are some examples of VACS policies to draw inspiration from as well as a list of resources for victims of sexual violence in French and English as well as resources for persons who perpetrated this sexual violence in French and in English .
Create safe spaces to encourage criticism and the sharing of problematic behaviors
The care committee, for example, could create an anonymous feedback/criticism/comments box, the content of which could then be shared at the assembly or with targeted people. The committee could also decide to offer in-person support in order to be an attentive ear to people who need to share anything in a non-anonymous way, without necessarily being comfortable speaking in front of an entire assembly. .
Pay attention to the minimization of the importance of care work and the tendency of several activist circles to place the burden of this work on women, transfeminine and/or LGBTQIA2S+ people.
Provide psychological support
An occupation can be a moment of enormous stress where a heavy mental load can weigh on members. Some groups like to have an external resource person available to all participants who want it.
Obstacles to Horizontality
Horizontality refers to the active creation of nonhierarchical relations through decision-making processes.
Negotiations
When negotiations are held with a body of power (school or business administration, government, etc.) there is a danger that the members of the negotiating team will accumulate more information, and therefore power over the rest of the group.
How to reduce the risk of the negotiating team hoarding power:
- Popularize information on the issue through popularization documents and workshops
- Open trading positions to everyone
- Consider the negotiating team as a simple channel of communication between the administration and the assembly; the role of the negotiating team is not to make decisions in front of the administration, but to report the decisions of the assembly.
Great turnout
Some occupations bring together a hundred people, while others bring together thousands. In the second case, it is more difficult to organize popular assemblies which bring together all the members.
A method of decision-making when the number of participants is immense may be to organize strategic meetings in small groups open to all participants. In this way, people who decide to spend less time in the occupation and not take part in decisions will be free to do so. When applicable, it is of course necessary to follow Indigenous leadership in relation to the occupation.
Testimonials
Testimony of a person who experienced the occupations of nuclear power plant construction sites with Clamshell Alliance
[1]
| Hit |
[In criticizing the occupations carried out by the Clamshell Alliance, the person proposes what might have measured the success of an occupation] The success of an occupation would be measured by 1. Going to a site, staying there and blocking construction. 2. Do it in a direct democracy and in a community way where self-confidence and initiative are reinforced among the participants. Ideally, the idea of an expropriation would be advanced there. |
Testimonies collected during the sharing circle
| Emergence of the idea and preparation |
The idea of the occupation arrived in a big brainstorm. Occupation was within the possibilities, but not the ultimate goal. A comrade proposed to go on a hunger strike, which for us was the most intense action we could do for the disinvestment of our university. When we saw that [another university] was carrying out an occupation, we decided to organize not only a hunger strike but also an occupation to support the hunger strikers. Organized within a week or two (including the logistical issue of food for participants) |
| Reappropriation of an industrial zone |
We are organizing in a former abandoned industrial zone where no occupation has been organized in due form, but we are working to frequent it and reclaim it. There have also always been camps of homeless people, which have multiplied during the pandemic. Nice collaborations between the people who came to clean the land but who did not live there, and those who lived there in tents / small trailers). Then the police intervened and there was a resumption of work. This is where the group made petitions, demonstrations, other artistic and family actions, blockages against the resumption of work. It's difficult because everyone (municipal, provincial, |
| Escalation of pressure tactics |
The occupation was the first step. There has been no escalation of pressure tactics, although there have been demonstrations, actions and petitions in support of the occupation. |
| Democratization of space |
Several narratives about why our group made an occupation exist and form intersections. One of the reasons is that our group has existed for about ten years. In the past few years, we have done occupations, but also internal pressure with the management as well as education of the student body. Quickly this year, the idea of “democratizing” our university became more and more interesting, and our occupation was part of this desire for democratization. We wanted to open up the occupation space, make it participatory, and make decisions collectively in popular assemblies. |
| Interaction with the police in the forest |
For about 8 months, people occupied the forest without reprisals - the only police presence was bi-weekly police visits. No electricity or running water. Latrines, gas and campfire heating. Then the logging company filed an injunction. That's when the police arrived, and the arrests were daily. Support for arrested persons has been set up. People could spend several hours or even days in cement structures or trees intended to delay their arrest. |
| Unfolding in a university |
In the context of one university in particular, the lobby was stormed in less than an hour. We entered all our equipment there as quickly as possible, taking it out of our cars which had parked in front of the entrance. We set up our tents, making sure we could be comfortable. Daily life was punctuated by our meetings with the rectorate and security; every time we had to make a decision and meet with security/rectorate, we held a popular assembly. We also organized a host of activities and conferences. These activities were held at the same time as two people went on a hunger strike. |
| Support |
Many student associations on strike during the occupation; so many people were available to ensure a presence on the scene. Contact with student associations and the teachers' union was made beforehand so that they positioned themselves for the divestment of fossil fuels. |
| Daily |
Different working groups - care committee, food committee, equipment committee, safety committee. People weren't taking the lead, just bottom-liners to make sure things got done. We did not have an intense response from security or management. We had also set up a study area. We had daily popular assemblies as well as a board of tasks to separate. It was a good way to include new people and have a transparent operation. Some days were very busy with workshops, but even when the days were freer, finding more formal meeting times was difficult. Moreover, we didn't know everyone: how to trust the people who join the space ? How do we make more difficult discussions (eg: escalation of pressure tactics) accessible to new people? |
| Deterrence Techniques |
On the first day, security warned occupants of the fire danger of staying in the space overnight. Another incident was that an employee set an alarm to disturb the occupants for about an hour. It was not bad both security incidents. |
| Negotiations and horizontality |
The more the occupation advanced, the more difficult it was to maintain horizontality. The people who were going to negotiate with the administration were of course those who were most aware of the progress of the negotiations. Even if these people reported the negotiations to the meeting, some information could not be fully disclosed. When you are in a position to negotiate, you have to be honest with both the assembly and the administration. The role of the negotiating team is not to make decisions in front of the administration, but to report the decisions of the assembly. It wasn't that bad for week-long negotiations, but it's unclear whether the horizontality would have held if the negotiations had stretched out over time. To form the negotiating team, positions were opened. On the other hand, as soon as it fell into technicalities (finances, carbon indicators...) it was more difficult to include everyone. It is even difficult to popularize to people who participate in the occupation (but who are not in the negotiating team). Another important aspect: the administration had difficulty understanding the principle of horizontality of the group. They thought that some people who took more leadership were spokespersons for the movement, when they were not. This put an additional mental load on these people. was more difficult to include everyone. It is even difficult to popularize to people who participate in the occupation (but who are not in the negotiating team). Another important aspect: the administration had difficulty understanding the principle of horizontality of the group. They thought that some people who took more leadership were spokespersons for the movement, when they were not. This put an additional mental load on these people. was more difficult to include everyone. It is even difficult to popularize to people who participate in the occupation (but who are not in the negotiating team). Another important aspect: the administration had difficulty understanding the principle of horizontality of the group. They thought that some people who took more leadership were spokespersons for the movement, when they were not. This put an additional mental load on these people. They thought that some people who took more leadership were spokespersons for the movement, when they were not. This put an additional mental load on these people. They thought that some people who took more leadership were spokespersons for the movement, when they were not. This put an additional mental load on these people. |
| Power dynamics |
We try to prevent people who have been in the occupation longer from having more influence and power, but this is difficult to prevent completely. When we started having a headquarters, as well as 2000-3000 people at the occupation, it was even more difficult to keep our horizontality. To get organized, we had strategic meetings in small groups. Everyone could join, without obligation. Difficult to integrate people who are present for 2-3 days in decision-making. We also followed the words of the Aboriginal elders on site. |
| Integrating care in the face of police repression |
We made a lot of mistakes. So many people joined in that it was hard to keep track. We had an arrest support list. We had a support circle accessible online for people who had left the site. For those who were on the site, we had established a "Rest and relaxation" camp where people who wanted to take a break were invited. Massages. Some people emerged from the occupation with police-related trauma. It is important to communicate with our circle of friends who were present at the occupation. |
| Daily care |
The question of care was not our strength, among other things because the occupation was carried out at the last minute. There was a space in the assemblies to give comments, criticisms and to suggest improvements. We had sentient guardians on site who could be met privately if we didn't want to talk about it in a large group. Also, it took us 2-3 days to realize that we didn't have a process for VACS. We had an outside resource person for psychological problems. Very stressful, a lot of mental load. We held a debriefing after the end of the occupation to freely discuss care issues, among other things. |
| Ensuring the safety of certain people |
Several young indigenous people had been arrested a few weeks before: so the watchword of this occupation was really to keep ourselves safe and to have as many people as possible to keep the young indigenous people safe. We used a mass messaging tool (for example to broadcast an invitation to come to the occupation as reinforcements because of white supremacists who might be there). Our police liaisons were white and colonizing to ensure Indigenous and racialized people do not interact with the police. Throughout our occupation, we have also realized the importance of songs and celebrating and organizing film screening evenings. |
If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca.