Greenwashing: Difference between revisions
| Line 20: | Line 20: | ||
|} | |} | ||
<br> | <br> | ||
Revision as of 20:25, 1 September 2022
Greenwashing, coined by Jay Westerveld, describes practices of branding or marketing that mislead consumers about social and environmental benefits to generate profit without meaningfully acting on the issues they claim to support; a common strategy adopted by the fast fashion and fossil fuel industries - Remake Our World, adapted by Michelle Xie [1]
Examples of Greenwashing
Canadian Banks
|
Several climate justice groups in so-called Canada are targeting Canada's major banks for their investments in fossil fuels. |
|
Banks know from their consumer preferences research that climate change matters to their customers, so most of them put a small amount of their funding towards initiatives that encourage a 'green' image. This misleads the public into believing that they are environmentally-friendly companies, as some of the largest fossil fuel funders in the world. [2] |
|
Check out this instagram post by Banking on a Better Future for more specific examples of RBC's greenwashing. |
Exxon Mobile [3]
ExxonMobil has taken many initiatives to paint themselves as a 'green' company, despite being a fossil fuel company (direct culprits behind the climate crisis). For example, they say they have invested more than $10 billion in “lower-emission technologies” since 2000. In 2021, the company unveiled a division called ‘Low Carbon Solutions’ with plans to invest $3 billion on “lower emission energy solutions” through 2025, specifically through carbon capture and storage.
Between 2010 and 2018, ExxonMobil reportedly spent 0.2% of its capital expenditure on sources of low-carbon energy.
If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca.
