Consensus decision making (suggestions for small groups): Difference between revisions
(Created page with "'''The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model suggested for small groups. It <span style="">focuses on active listening and teamwork. </span><span style="">It has been successful according to the testimonies and experience of many people who have applied it in their groups (Fairy Creek and Extinction Rebellion).</span>''' '''<span style=""></span>''' '''<span style="">When to use this model?</span>''' For small groups (less than 15 pe...") |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 17: | Line 17: | ||
*<span style="">Informal discussions (between the person who blocked the idea and the person who proposed it) can resolve a dispute over a proposal. </span><span style="">An improved version may be submitted to the group.</span> | *<span style="">Informal discussions (between the person who blocked the idea and the person who proposed it) can resolve a dispute over a proposal. </span><span style="">An improved version may be submitted to the group.</span> | ||
*<span style="">An idea cannot be blocked more than 3 times. </span><span style="">After 3 resumptions, the idea cannot be submitted to the group again.</span> | *<span style="">An idea cannot be blocked more than 3 times. </span><span style="">After 3 resumptions, the idea cannot be submitted to the group again.</span> | ||
<br> | |||
If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca. | |||
<br>[[File:Creative commons.png|300px|link=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|center|frameless]] | |||
<div style="text-align:center;">This work is licensed under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License].</div> | |||
'''[https://en.wiki.lehub.ca/index.php/Militant_Wiki Back to Homepage]''' | |||
Revision as of 13:42, 2 December 2022
The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model suggested for small groups. It focuses on active listening and teamwork. It has been successful according to the testimonies and experience of many people who have applied it in their groups (Fairy Creek and Extinction Rebellion).
When to use this model?
For small groups (less than 15 people) with a level of trust and who feel they've gotten to know one another.
Decision-making steps
'1'. Proposal(s)
By this point, discussion should have been completed (if relevant) to understand the decision to be made. A proposal is made to summarize the discussion of ideas on the decision at hand.
2. Introspection
The group takes a few minutes to think about the proposal.
3. Questions
A first round of questions and answers is done.
- The person who proposed answers the questions directly.
- Each person can choose whether or not to use their speaking turn
4. Concerns
A round of concerns is risen.
5. Improvements
A round of improvements is made.
6. Rewording
The person who came up with the idea reformulates it and shares it with the group.
7. Adoption
If no one blocks the idea, it is adopted.
In case of blockage
- If a person blocks a proposal, it is not adopted. It can still be submitted again.
- Informal discussions (between the person who blocked the idea and the person who proposed it) can resolve a dispute over a proposal. An improved version may be submitted to the group.
- An idea cannot be blocked more than 3 times. After 3 resumptions, the idea cannot be submitted to the group again.
If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca.
