Consensus decision making (suggestions for small groups): Difference between revisions
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
(Created page with "'''The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model suggested for small groups. It <span style="">focuses on active listening and teamwork. </span><span style="">It has been successful according to the testimonies and experience of many people who have applied it in their groups (Fairy Creek and Extinction Rebellion).</span>''' '''<span style=""></span>''' '''<span style="">When to use this model?</span>''' For small groups (less than 15 pe...") |
No edit summary |
||
| (8 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
'''The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model suggested for small groups. It <span style="">focuses on active listening and teamwork. </span><span style="">It has been successful according to the testimonies and experience of many people who have applied it in their groups (Fairy Creek and Extinction Rebellion).</span>''' | '''The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model suggested for small groups. It <span style="">focuses on active listening and teamwork. </span><span style="">It has been successful according to the testimonies and experience of many people who have applied it in their groups (Fairy Creek and Extinction Rebellion).</span>''' | ||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
'''<span style=""></span>''' | '''<span style=""></span>''' | ||
'''<span style="">When to use this model?</span>''' | '''<span style="">When to use this model?</span>''' | ||
For small groups (less than 15 people) with a level of trust and who feel they've gotten to know one another. | For small groups (less than 15 people) with a level of trust and who feel they've gotten to know one another. If you are lacking trust or haven't gotten to know each other well enough, see our wiki page on [[modified consensus decision making (suggestions for large and small groups)]] | ||
= Decision-making steps = | = Decision-making steps = | ||
<p>'''<span>1. Proposal</span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">By this point, discussion should have been completed (if relevant) to understand the decision to be made. A proposal is made to summarize the discussion of ideas on the decision at hand. </span></p> | |||
<p><br></p> | |||
<p>'''<span style="">2. Introspection </span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">The group takes a few minutes to think about the proposal.</span></p> | |||
<p><br></p> | |||
<p>'''<span style="">3. Questions</span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">A first round of questions and answers is done.</span></p> | |||
*<span style="">The person who proposed answers the questions directly.</span> | *<span style="">The person who proposed answers the questions directly.</span> | ||
*<span style="">Each person can choose whether or not to use their speaking turn</span> | *<span style="">Each person can choose whether or not to use their speaking turn</span> | ||
<p><br></p><p>'''<span style="">4. Concerns</span>'''</p><p><span style="">A round of concerns is risen.</span></p><p><br></p><p>'''<span style="">5. Improvements</span>'''</p><p><span style="">A round of improvements is made.</span></p><p><br></p><p>'''<span style="">6. Rewording</span>'''</p><p><span style="">The person who came up with the idea reformulates it and shares it with the group.</span></p><p><br></p><p>'''<span style="">7. Adoption</span>'''</p><p><span style="">If no one blocks the idea, it is adopted.</span></p> | <p><br></p> | ||
<p>'''<span style="">4. Concerns</span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">A round of concerns is risen.</span></p> | |||
<p><br></p> | |||
<p>'''<span style="">5. Improvements</span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">A round of improvements is made.</span></p> | |||
<p><br></p> | |||
<p>'''<span style="">6. Rewording</span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">The person who came up with the idea reformulates it and shares it with the group.</span></p> | |||
<p><br></p> | |||
<p>'''<span style="">7. Adoption</span>'''</p> | |||
<p><span style="">If no one blocks the idea, it is adopted.</span></p> | |||
= In case of blockage = | = In case of blockage = | ||
*<span style="">If a person blocks a proposal, it is not adopted. </span><span style="">It can still be submitted again. </span> | *<span style="">If a person blocks a proposal, it is not adopted. </span><span style="">It can still be submitted again. </span> | ||
*<span style="">Informal discussions (between the person who blocked the idea and the person who proposed it) can resolve a dispute over a proposal. </span><span style="">An improved version may be submitted to the group.</span> | *<span style="">Informal discussions (between the person who blocked the idea and the person who proposed it) can resolve a dispute over a proposal. </span><span style="">An improved version may be submitted to the group.</span> | ||
*<span style="">An idea cannot be blocked more than 3 times. </span><span style="">After 3 resumptions, the idea cannot be submitted to the group again.</span> | *<span style="">An idea cannot be blocked more than 3 times. </span><span style="">After 3 resumptions, the idea cannot be submitted to the group again.</span> | ||
If you still have questions about consensus decision making, or would like to try a modified version, see our wiki page on [https://en.wiki.lehub.ca/index.php/Modified_consensus_decision_making_(suggestions_for_large_groups) modified consensus decision making]. | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
<br> | |||
If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca. | |||
<br>[[File:Creative commons.png|300px|link=https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/|center|frameless]] | |||
<div style="text-align:center;">This work is licensed under a [https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License].</div> | |||
'''[https://en.wiki.lehub.ca/index.php/Militant_Wiki Back to Homepage]''' | |||
Latest revision as of 15:45, 14 February 2023
The following resource describes a consensus-type decision-making model suggested for small groups. It focuses on active listening and teamwork. It has been successful according to the testimonies and experience of many people who have applied it in their groups (Fairy Creek and Extinction Rebellion).
When to use this model?
For small groups (less than 15 people) with a level of trust and who feel they've gotten to know one another. If you are lacking trust or haven't gotten to know each other well enough, see our wiki page on modified consensus decision making (suggestions for large and small groups)
Decision-making steps
1. Proposal
By this point, discussion should have been completed (if relevant) to understand the decision to be made. A proposal is made to summarize the discussion of ideas on the decision at hand.
2. Introspection
The group takes a few minutes to think about the proposal.
3. Questions
A first round of questions and answers is done.
- The person who proposed answers the questions directly.
- Each person can choose whether or not to use their speaking turn
4. Concerns
A round of concerns is risen.
5. Improvements
A round of improvements is made.
6. Rewording
The person who came up with the idea reformulates it and shares it with the group.
7. Adoption
If no one blocks the idea, it is adopted.
In case of blockage
- If a person blocks a proposal, it is not adopted. It can still be submitted again.
- Informal discussions (between the person who blocked the idea and the person who proposed it) can resolve a dispute over a proposal. An improved version may be submitted to the group.
- An idea cannot be blocked more than 3 times. After 3 resumptions, the idea cannot be submitted to the group again.
If you still have questions about consensus decision making, or would like to try a modified version, see our wiki page on modified consensus decision making.
If you have any suggested revisions or additional resources to share related to the above content, please email them to kenzie@lehub.ca.
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.